Can you hear that child crying?

By Uma Sudhir

Nothing is quite as heartbreaking as hearing a child cry. And with Nartana, all of us cried. Here was this 6-year-old child from Nellore in Andhra Pradesh, with knife-cut and burn injuries all over her body, injuries inflicted with a hot iron knife, by a cruel, sick person, possibly her own mother.

What’s more, the child’s cry had not been allowed to be heard outside the confines of the walls, the child called a home. And how. By muffling her voice by stuffing cloth in her mouth and raising the volume of the television in the room, so that when her tormentors indulged in the worst, inhuman acts of torture, the world outside would know nothing of it.

Sometimes you need to thank a power-cut. That’s how, I am told, the TV was off and a neighbour heard the child’s screaming, helpless voice. And Nartana got rescued. A small girl, in many ways still a baby (the baby fat quite visible), bruised all over, the soles of baby feet cut exposing raw flesh, infected and raw, the branding marks left by a hot iron, black marks around her eyes, patterns left on her back from flogging, the scalp looking bald in patches. Don’t know if it is from forcible pulling of hair or an infection.

Nartana unfortunately, became a spectacle before the world. It is easy to blame the local media crews and cameras whose prying eyes tried to capture her pain to show the world, asking her questions for which she hardly had any answers, even as the innocent child looked on, dazed, fear clearly written all over her face.

I personally couldn’t disagree when some critics called the endless discussion and analysis and comments from all and sundry on the subject, on some Telugu news channels, a media circus, trying to milk the tragedy for what it is worth. The girl was practically on auction, with public pronouncements being made to tell the world how much their heart beat for the child.

But then it is also true, as Arundhati Roy put it, that even Gandhian satyagraha doesn’t work without an audience. So also the role of the media. And here there is a larger purpose served from the `sensational’ story. The child would hopefully get some help, some attention. It would rake up a debate and review of the places presumed to be safe for a child, like her school and her home. Make us rethink about concluding that a mother is always the best natural guardian for a child. May be we would seriously start putting in place mechanisms to monitor and ensure that children have a safe childhood.

After all, both the accused in this case were teachers. The mother, a primary school science teacher in a government school. And her friend ran a private school for small children. If they could allegedly torture Nartana to such an extent with no sense of guilt or wrongdoing and hide it from the world so skilfully, could they have been good teachers, in whose custody one can trust children to be safe? Most unlikely.

A senior police officer shared his anguish that the media hype was in violation of the law and also child rights. That as per section 21 of Juvenile Justice Act, a child in need of care and protection should not be exposed in the media. That the offence is cognizable and those guilty may be asked to pay upto 25000 rupees in fine. “I know your channel masked the face and injuries of the child but then…”

The police officers dealing with the case may have been aware of the legal provisions to protect the child but who will tame the media bull. Not so easy. Experience has also taught us that most times, once the media moves on, so will the concern for the child’s welfare.

Having said that, violation of the child’s rights by the socalled saviours, in the media, law and order machinery, women and child welfare department and even social activists, remains a big concern that needs to be addressed. Doing something good cannot be an excuse for doing something wrong as well.

As I write this, my own 7-year-old, up from bed, comes rushing into my arms, confident of the love and security she will get there. Doesn’t every innocent little child deserve this? I am hoping some day soon, Nartana will get this loving embrace, even if not from the mother who brought her into the world.

(Please post your comment to tell us what you thought of this blog. You can also subscribe to the blogsite to receive regular updates)


About t s sudhir & uma sudhir

Uma Sudhir and T S Sudhir are senior journalists, based in Hyderabad. Both work for NDTV. Uma is a Tamilian, who was educated in
This entry was posted in Child rights and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Can you hear that child crying?

  1. Mahesh says:

    Well said Sudhir. Hope every member of Media will get enlightened like you on one day.

    • Ajaya Kumar Vemulapati says:

      I agree with your views on Nartana’s episode. But Sir, maybe if not for the media expose, she might not have received the help she is receiving today. I was also moved by the expose and it made me sick to think that the child’s own mother could do this. When i heard that the local teachers were pooling money to fund for the medicines for Nartana, I called up the local correspondent of Tv9 and immediately arranged Rs 12000.00 cash. Tv 9 wanted me to come on air but i refused and said i only wished that the child receives all help possible. Even now as i’m writing this i’m watching a scroll on a local tv channel of a boy’s hand being axed to ‘rescue ‘ the hand which got caught in a sugar cane crushing machine. We simply do not have any value for any form of life and human life is no exception. Coming back to Nartana, i still find it very hard to comprehend how a mother could be so cruel. I too have a seven year old kid at home and i know what it means to give and receive love from the child. Hope Nartana gets care and love she so desperately needs from a parent somewhere.

  2. Anita says:

    Very well written, but the tragedy remains… today one child has been saved from physical torture, wonder how many little angels go thru this and a lot more… Wish the world was a better place to live in for these children who are way too innocent to understand the harsh realities of life……

  3. Serenity Stupidity says:

    Dear Uma,

    Suicide of prasanna.

    A Young life who wished to be away from, but could not handle, the glare brought in by media “attention” to judgment.

    Who is to Judge media, How.

    “…Societal and regulatory mechanisms for monitoring status of children…”

    Dream Debt.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s