Kavitha’s argument out of tune?


By T S Sudhir
Is it an act of sedition to say Hyderabad and Kashmir were forcefully annexed to the Indian Union post independence in 1947? Is it an act of sedition to suggest that India must accept the reality (meaning to say – recognise the reality of the LoC) and move on?
My mind, with limited knowledge of law, says not really. Both points were uttered by K Kavitha, TRS MP from Nizamabad and daughter of Telangana chief minister, K Chandrasekhar Rao at a media conclave in July. For which now, on the orders of a lower court in Hyderabad, the city police has booked Kavitha under three different sections of the IPC, one of which is for sedition.
Kavitha_T-Jagruthi
Yes, there is an error when relating history on Kavitha’s part and equating Hyderabad with Kashmir is certainly wrong. The Maharaja of Kashmir did want to remain independent like the Nizam of Hyderabad. But when the Pakistan raiders overran his kingdom, he turned to India for help and agreed to make his kingdom a part of India.
That was not quite the case with Hyderabad where the Nizam had to be shown the might of India to fall in line. Police action in September 1948 ensured the kingdom of Hyderabad – which is largely present-day Telangana – became part of India. But again here, it was only the Nizam who became a reluctant Indian citizen. Because his subjects fed up of the atrocities committed by the Razakars, wanted Hyderabad to merge with the Indian Union. So to say “forcefully annexed” is not entirely rooted in history. The 7th Nizam, Mir Osman Alik Khan was merely the ruler of Hyderabad, he wasn’t Hyderabad.
The second comment is more of a suggestion, a solution to somehow take things forward. But to make it seem as if PoK is akin to a land having been grabbed and you give up the fight against the land grabber, is not quite the thing to say, more so when you are an MP. This is about patriotism, even if it is a tad impractical. Yes, it is highly unlikely that India would be able to get PoK vacated by Pakistan but you do not agree, like a meek country, to shrink in size. Certainly not a big brother like India.
The intent behind Kavitha’s remarks, to my mind, is not wrong. But they certainly go against the idea of India. An India who is strong. An India where the people mattered more than what an autocratic ruler did. For Kavitha to reduce the issue to a petitioner trying to have his day of glory, is not really what one would expect from someone like her.
Advertisements

About t s sudhir & uma sudhir

Uma Sudhir and T S Sudhir are senior journalists, based in Hyderabad. Both work for NDTV. Uma is a Tamilian, who was educated in
This entry was posted in Hyderabad, Telangana and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Kavitha’s argument out of tune?

  1. Rangarajan says:

    It certainly attracts provisions of sedition charge, as it came not from the mouth of any lay woman, but an honorable Menber of Parliament. To construe that she was not aware of the implications for India at the global level and the irksome position the country could face on the external affairs front would be too naive. What’s her political experience and knowledge of India’s history?

    This comment, highly unwarranted, could give handle to India baiters. The MP should even be stripped of her post and the sedition charge should be taken ahead in the right perspective to its logical end.

  2. sbangarp says:

    You are being too soft. She not only forgot the sentiments of the people of Telangana during the time of police action but laments on special safeguards that Telangana people lost regarding outsiders not holding land and NTR violating it? That there were safeguards that outsiders could not hold land in telangana. If he violated it, where does it stand now? What kind of statement is that?

    Being educated is one thing but being responsible is quite different. People of AP(erstwhile?) were known to be very patriotic. Many named their sons Gandhi, Nehru, Bose etc. Always kept country at the forefront. This is a new brand of politicians that think of their region first. And believe spewing hatred is like oxygen to their existence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s